Dashnaiv Peptides
Stacks·CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin

CJC-1295 and ipamorelin: how the blend works, the doses that circulate, and what studies actually tested

Two secretagogues, two receptors, one hormone. What each compound's own studies show, why the DAC question changes every schedule, and the absence of any trial of the pair.

Human clinical trial at most 3 combination studies indexed 3 sources Updated

At a glance

Components
CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin
2 compounds
Strongest possible tier
Human clinical trial
a stack cannot exceed its weakest component
Studies of the combination
3
indexed papers mentioning both; see below for what they tested
Reviewed by Adam Mirando, PharmD, on . What changed

What the CJC-1295 and ipamorelin blend is

CJC-1295 with ipamorelin is the most searched peptide combination in this reference. CJC-1295 is a modified growth-hormone-releasing-hormone fragment; ipamorelin acts on the ghrelin receptor. They stimulate the same pituitary output through two different receptors, which is the entire rationale for blending them.

Three indexed papers mention both compounds. None tested the blend for any outcome in people; two are analytical-chemistry papers about detecting the compounds, and one is a review of six peptides. CJC-1295 with a drug-affinity complex was tested in healthy adults in 2006 and raised growth hormone and IGF-1 for about a week per injection; ipamorelin's two human trials measured pharmacokinetics and a surgical outcome.

Neither is an approved medicine, and both are prohibited in sport under WADA S2.

CJC-1295 and ipamorelin in two minutes

What it is. A blend of two growth-hormone secretagogues that act on different receptors: CJC-1295, an analogue of the hypothalamic releasing hormone GHRH, and ipamorelin, an agonist at the ghrelin receptor. Both prompt the pituitary to release growth hormone; the reasoning for combining them is that the two signals amplify each other, which is well described for the natural hormones and untested for this pair in people.

Two very different CJC-1295s. "CJC-1295 with DAC" carries a drug-affinity complex that binds albumin and extends its half-life to roughly a week; "CJC-1295 without DAC", usually called modified GRF 1-29, lasts about half an hour. Vendors sell both under the same name, and the schedules that circulate differ completely between them.

What has been tested. CJC-1295 with DAC in healthy adults in 2006: single injections raised growth hormone and IGF-1 for six days or more. Ipamorelin in two human trials: pharmacokinetics in volunteers and a failed trial for post-surgical gut recovery. The blend: nothing in people. Three indexed papers mention both; none tested them together for an outcome.

What circulates. 100 to 300 micrograms of each, injected one to three times daily, often before bed, for eight to twelve weeks; or, with the DAC form, 1 to 2 milligrams of CJC-1295 weekly plus daily ipamorelin. Untested figures.

Status. Neither approved anywhere. Both WADA S2, prohibited at all times. CJC-1295's clinical development ended after a death in a 2006 trial; the cause was not attributed to the drug, but the programme did not resume.

Editorial synthesis Written from general pharmacology, the development record and what is commonly reported; not a cited finding. Cited findings on this page carry their own tier.

Each component on its own evidence

Each component carries its own tier. Adding compounds together does not add their evidence together.

Each component's own record. Nothing is inferred across rows.
CompoundTierPublicationsRCTsHuman studies in ledger
CJC-1295Human clinical trial3713
IpamorelinHuman clinical trial6322

Papers that name every component

Indexed papers that mention every component, quoted. A count of zero is the finding, not a gap in this page.

  • Animal study rats 2026 Animal, preclinical
    To summarize existing peer-reviewed data on 6 emerging peptides (BPC-157, thymosin beta-4 or TB-500, CJC-1295, MK-677, ipamorelin, and GHK-Cu [copper peptide]) for musculoskeletal recovery and enhancement in animal and human models.
    Source pmid-42578445 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • In vitro study 2019 Mechanistic, in vitro
    Comparison with reference standards unequivocally identified the content of the powders as analogs of the growth hormone secretagogues GHRP-2 (Pralmorelin), GHRP-6, Ipamorelin, and modified growth hormone releasing factor (modified GRF 1-29), which can be used as performance-enhancing substances in sports.
    Source pmid-30136411 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Animal study 2013 Animal, preclinical
    In our study, a simple mixed-mode anion exchange solid-phase extraction cartridge was employed for the extraction of seven target peptides (GHRP-1, GHRP-2, GHRP-6, ipamorelin, hexarelin, CJC-1295, and N-acetylated LKKTETQ (active ingredient of TB-500)) and their in vitro metabolites from horse plasma.
    Source pmid-23318763 · quoted verbatim from the abstract

CJC-1295 and ipamorelin dosage: what circulates versus what studies used

Which CJC-1295 is meant changes everything in this table. Read the first column.

FigureDoseScheduleBasis
CJC-1295 with DAC, 2006 human study30 to 60 µg/kg, single or repeated subcutaneous injectionsSingle dose, or weekly to fortnightlyHealthy adults; GH and IGF-1 raised for 6 or more days per dose
Ipamorelin, 1999 human studyIntravenous infusions, 4.2 to 140 nmol/kgSingle dosesHealthy volunteers; 2-hour half-life; one GH pulse
The blend, any study——None in people
Commonly reported, no-DAC blend100 to 300 µg of each, subcutaneous1 to 3 times daily, often before bed, 8 to 12 weeksUntested
Commonly reported, DAC form1 to 2 mg CJC-1295 DAC plus 100 to 300 µg ipamorelin dailyCJC weekly, ipamorelin dailyUntested

The blend vials sold as "CJC-1295/ipamorelin 5 mg/5 mg" or "10 mg" are almost always the no-DAC form. Someone applying the DAC schedule to a no-DAC vial, or the reverse, is not following any protocol at all, which is one reason the circulating figures cannot be treated as a regimen.

Editorial synthesis Written from general pharmacology, the development record and what is commonly reported; not a cited finding. Cited findings on this page carry their own tier.

How the two act, and why the pairing has pharmacological logic

In the body, growth hormone is released in pulses when the hypothalamus secretes GHRH and the stomach secretes ghrelin at the same time; each signal alone releases some hormone, and together they release more than the sum. CJC-1295 mimics the first signal and ipamorelin the second. That is real physiology, described in studies of the natural hormones and of older secretagogues such as GHRP-6 with GHRH. What has never been done is to test whether this particular pair, at the doses that circulate, produces the effects people want, or whether repeated stimulation over months changes anything downstream.

The 2006 CJC-1295 work is the strongest evidence for either component and it cuts both ways: it showed the DAC form keeps growth hormone and IGF-1 raised for a week, which is the opposite of the pulsatile pattern the blend is marketed as preserving.

Editorial synthesis Written from general pharmacology, the development record and what is commonly reported; not a cited finding. Cited findings on this page carry their own tier.

Who discusses using it, and the cautions that recur

  • Blood sugar. Growth hormone opposes insulin; sustained IGF-1 elevation with the DAC form is the specific concern.
  • Active or recent cancer. IGF-1 promotes cell growth; every review lists it first.
  • Water retention, joint aches, numbness in the hands. The classical signs of excess growth hormone, reported in communities with higher doses of the DAC form.
  • Athletes. Both compounds S2, detectable, prohibited at all times.
  • Adolescents, pregnancy, pituitary or thyroid disease. No data, and the axis being stimulated is either still developing or already abnormal.

Editorial synthesis Written from general pharmacology, the development record and what is commonly reported; not a cited finding. Cited findings on this page carry their own tier.

Common mistakes in how this blend is discussed

  • Not saying which CJC-1295. Half-hour and week-long half-lives cannot share a schedule.
  • Calling it "natural" because it releases the body's own hormone. The DAC form produces a sustained elevation the body never does.
  • Treating the three indexed papers as combination evidence. Two are about detecting the compounds in samples; one is a review.
  • Reading the 2006 study as safety data. It was a small pharmacokinetic study in healthy people, and the programme ended.

Editorial synthesis Written from general pharmacology, the development record and what is commonly reported; not a cited finding. Cited findings on this page carry their own tier.

Open questions

  • No human study of the blend exists.
  • Whether repeated stimulation over months changes IGF-1, glucose or the pituitary's own rhythm has not been measured for either component at the doses that circulate.
  • Which CJC-1295 form the circulating figures refer to is usually unstated.

Questions people ask

What is the difference between CJC-1295 with DAC and without DAC?

The drug-affinity complex binds the peptide to albumin in the blood, extending its half-life from about half an hour to roughly a week and producing a sustained rather than pulsed rise in growth hormone. "CJC-1295 without DAC" is modified GRF 1-29. Vendors use one name for both.

What doses of CJC-1295 and ipamorelin circulate?

Commonly 100 to 300 micrograms of each, one to three times daily for eight to twelve weeks; or 1 to 2 milligrams of the DAC form weekly with daily ipamorelin. No study tested any of these figures for any outcome.

Has the CJC-1295 and ipamorelin blend been studied in people?

No. Three indexed papers mention both compounds; two are analytical-chemistry papers and one is a review. Each compound alone has a small human record.

How long is the CJC-1295 half-life?

About 30 minutes without the drug-affinity complex, and roughly six to eight days with it, based on the 2006 human study of the DAC form.

What are the reported side effects?

From the 2006 study and community reports: injection-site reactions, flushing, headache, water retention, and with the DAC form the signs of sustained growth hormone excess. Long-term effects and effects on blood glucose have not been studied for the blend.

Is CJC-1295 with ipamorelin legal or approved?

Neither compound is approved anywhere. Both are on the WADA Prohibited List under S2, at all times. CJC-1295's clinical programme ended in 2006.

Why is it taken before bed?

Community reasoning: the largest natural growth hormone pulse occurs in early sleep and a dose then reinforces it, while food and a glucose rise blunt it. It is plausible physiology and has not been tested with this blend.

Is the blend better than either compound alone?

Unknown. The physiology of GHRH plus ghrelin signalling suggests a larger release, and older secretagogue studies support that; no study has tested this pair at these doses for any outcome.

Sources

Full citations. Every quoted claim above links to one of these.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Reference card

Reference card · generated /stacks/cjc-1295-ipamorelin
Stack
CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin
Strongest possible tier
Human clinical trial
Studies of the combination
3 indexed
Component evidence
CJC-1295: 37 publications, 1 RCTs · Ipamorelin: 63 publications, 2 RCTs
Sources in ledger
3

Figures are as published in each source and are not recommendations. Print or save this card with its date.

Last reviewed and what changed

  1. · Reviewed by Adam Mirando, PharmD, on 2026-09-29.
  2. · Written guide (quick answer, dosage chart distinguishing DAC and no-DAC forms, rationale, cautions, mistakes), eight FAQs, summary rewritten, intent-driven H1; page moved to the v2 stack layout. Demand: 'cjc 1295 ipamorelin' 49,500 Ads / 6,614 clickstream searches a month.
  3. · Stack record generated from research/registry.json plan; 3 combination claims drafted extractively by scripts/draft_claims.py.