Dashnaiv Peptides
Compounds·ghrh analogs·GHRH receptor agonist, stabilised GHRH analog

Tesamorelin

What 115 indexed publications and 22 randomized trials actually state about tesamorelin, sentence by sentence, each tied to its source and labeled by the kind of evidence it is.

Approved label 27 sources Updated Also: Egrifta

At a glance

Evidence availability
Approved label
Regulator-reviewed label exists
Indexed publications
115
Europe PMC, title or abstract, 2026-09-14
Human studies in ledger
19
15 randomized; study count, not efficacy proof
Approval
2010
ChEMBL phase 4 · ATC H01AC06
Routes reported
subcutaneous
from studies in this ledger
Studied in
Humans, Swine
22 primary studies in the evidence table
Compiled from 27 indexed sources, updated . Cited findings carry an evidence tier; passages written from general knowledge are marked editorial synthesis. Nothing here is medical or dosing advice. What changed

What it is

Tesamorelin is a peptide in the ghrh analogs class (GHRH receptor agonist, stabilised GHRH analog). Europe PMC indexes 115 publications naming it or a listed alias in a title or abstract, including 22 randomized controlled trials and 7 clinical trials of any design, as of . The strongest evidence tier in that literature is an approved medicine with a regulator-reviewed label.

This page reports what those studies state, sentence by sentence, with each statement tied to its source and labeled by the kind of evidence it is. It does not recommend use, and it does not translate study doses into anything personal.

What the evidence level means

Publication counts show what is indexed, not how strong the evidence is. The ledger below separates human clinical records from preclinical, analytical, and in-vitro work.

Human clinical studies in this ledger1915 randomized · 4 other human clinical
Evidence strengthNot yet assessedSeparate from evidence availability
Efficacy signalNot yet assessedRead the study result, not the tier alone

Interpretation boundary: An indexed publication count is a discovery measure. It does not establish efficacy, safety, approval, or a personal treatment plan.

What the evidence shows

One row per primary study in this record's ledger. Fields are read from each paper's indexing and abstract. "Analytical method" marks papers about detecting or measuring the compound rather than about its effects.

22 primary studies in this record's ledger, strongest evidence first. A dash means the abstract did not state the value.
StudyDesignnSpeciesDoseRouteDurationReported outcomeTier
Stewart 2026 Clinical trial 22 Humans1 mg—10 weeks Low-dose GHRH treatment was not directly linked with significant changes in study measures. Human clinical trial
Russo 2024 Randomized controlled trial 38 Humans2 mg once daily—— Tesamorelin led to significant declines in visceral fat (median [interquartile range]: -25 [-93, -2] vs. 14 [3, 41] cm 2 , P = 0.001), hepatic fat (-4.2% [-12.3%, -2.7%] vs. -0.5% [-3.9%, 2.7%], P = 0.01), and… Human clinical trial
Stanley 2021 Randomized controlled trial — Humans——— Circulating concentrations of 13 proteins were significantly decreased, and no proteins increased, by tesamorelin. Human clinical trial
Fourman 2021 Randomized controlled trial 58 Humans——— Individuals with fibrosis had higher NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 3.6 ± 2.0 vs 2.0 ± 0.8; P Conclusions In this longitudinal study of HIV-associated NAFLD, high rates of hepatic fibrosis… Human clinical trial
Fourman 2020 Randomized controlled trial — Humans——— Using gene set enrichment analysis, we found that tesamorelin increased hepatic expression of hallmark gene sets involved in oxidative phosphorylation and decreased hepatic expression of gene sets contributing to… Human clinical trial
Stanley 2019 Randomized controlled trial 61 Humans2 mg once daily; 2 mg daily—12 months; 6 month Patients receiving tesamorelin had a greater reduction of HFF than did patients receiving placebo, with an absolute effect size of -4·1% (95% CI -7·6 to -0·7, p=0·018), corresponding to a -37% (95% CI -67 to -7,… Human clinical trial
Adrian 2019 Randomized controlled trial 193 Humans——26 weeks In models adjusted for baseline differences and treatment arm, tesamorelin was associated with significantly greater increases in density of four truncal muscle groups (coefficient 1.56-4.86 Hounsfield units; all p… Human clinical trial
Braun 2017 Randomized controlled trial — Humans2mg—— Log 10 FGF21 tended to decrease in the tesamorelin group compared to placebo (p=0.06). Human clinical trial
Clemmons 2017 Randomized controlled trial 53 Humans2 mg—12 week; 12 weeks Total cholesterol (-0.3±0.6 mmol/L) and non-HDL cholesterol (-0.3±0.5 mmol/L) significantly decreased from baseline to Week 12 in the tesamorelin 2 mg group (p Conclusions Treatment of type 2 diabetic patients with… Human clinical trial
González-Sales 2015 Phase 1 clinical trial 41 Humans—subcutaneous— Within the range of the values evaluated no covariates were significantly associated with GH or IGF-1 model parameters. Human clinical trial
González-Sales 2015 Randomized controlled trial — Humans—subcutaneous— The fraction of tesamorelin absorbed by a first-order process is 13.1 % higher on day 14 compared with day 1. Human clinical trial
Stanley 2014 Randomized controlled trial 28 Humans2 mg; 9 mg/dsubcutaneous6 months; 2 weeks Tesamorelin significantly reduced visceral adipose tissue (mean change, -34 cm2 [95% CI, -53 to -15 cm2] with tesamorelin vs 8 cm2 [95% CI, -14 to 30 cm2] with placebo; treatment effect, -42 cm2 [95% CI, -71 to -14… Human clinical trial
Baker 2012 Randomized controlled trial 152 Humans—subcutaneous20 weeks; 10 week Treatment with GHRH increased insulin like growth factor 1 levels by 117 %(P.001), which remained within the physiological range, and reduced percent body fat by 7.4%(P.001). Human clinical trial
Makimura 2012 Randomized controlled trial — Humans—subcutaneous12 months VAT [-16 ± 9 vs.19 ± 9 cm(2), tesamorelin vs. placebo; treatment effect (95% confidence interval): -35 (-58, -12) cm(2); P = 0.003], cIMT (-0.03 ± 0.01 vs. 0.01 ± 0.01 mm; -0.04 (-0.07, -0.01) mm; P = 0.02), log… Human clinical trial
Stanley 2011 Randomized controlled trial 273 Humans2 mgsubcutaneous— At baseline, VAT was significantly associated with PAI-1 antigen (ρ = 0.36, P Conclusion In HIV patients with abdominal adiposity, tesamorelin may have a modest beneficial effect on adiponectin and fibrinolytic markers… Human clinical trial
Falutz 2008 Randomized controlled trial 273 Humans2 mgsubcutaneous26 weeks; 52 weeks The change in VAT was sustained at -18% over 52 weeks of treatment (P Conclusion Treatment with tesamorelin was generally well tolerated and resulted in sustained decreases in VAT and triglycerides over 52 weeks… Human clinical trial
Falutz 2005 Randomized controlled trial — Humans—subcutaneous— TH9507 resulted in dose-related physiological increases in IGF-I (P Conclusions TH9507 reduced truncal fat, improved the lipid profile and did not increase glucose levels in HIV-infected patients with central fat… Human clinical trial
Erlandson 2026 Human study — Humans——24 weeks; 24 week Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences and may inform future interventions to improve physical function among older adults living with HIV. Observational, human
Mihalache 2025 Human study — Humans——— Ten drugs were found to have significant overreporting of CTS, including idursulfase (ROR=51.2, 95% CI=39.0-67.2), galsulfase (ROR=26.8, 95% CI=17.2-41.7), laronidase (ROR=20.9, 95% CI=14.4-30.3), tesamorelin… Observational, human
Thomas 2022 Animal study — Swine——— In contrast to urine, blood analysis essentially relies on the detection of intact peptide hormones, and the expected concentrations are commonly higher in blood samples than in urine. Animal, preclinical
Uçaktürk 2026 In vitro study — Humans——— — Mechanistic, in vitro
Cristea 2023 In vitro study — ———— — Mechanistic, in vitro

Doses reported in studies

Each entry is a sentence quoted from the study's abstract, with the study's design, sample size and year in front of it. Comparator doses in the same sentence are not attributed to tesamorelin.

  • Clinical trial humans n = 22 2026 Human clinical trial
    Doses stated in the abstract: 1 mg
    In a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial, we assessed 22 subjects with baseline cognition ranging from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment before and after 10 weeks of treatment with low-dose tesamorelin (1 mg; GHRH analog) or placebo.
    Source pmid-42382101 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 38 2024 Human clinical trial
    Doses stated in the abstract: 2 mg once daily
    We leveraged a randomized double-blind trial of 61 PWH and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tesamorelin 2 mg once daily vs. identical placebo among participants on INSTI-based regimens at baseline.
    Source pmid-38905488 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 61 2019 Human clinical trial
    Doses stated in the abstract: 2 mg once daily; 2 mg daily
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either tesamorelin 2 mg once daily or placebo once daily for 12 months, followed by a 6-month open-label phase during which all participants received tesamorelin 2 mg daily.
    Source pmid-31611038 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans 2017 Human clinical trial
    Doses stated in the abstract: 2mg
    Methods 50 HIV-infected men and women with increased abdominal adiposity participated in this randomized, placebo-controlled trial of tesamorelin, 2mg vs. identical placebo daily for six months.
    Source pmid-29031905 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 53 2017 Human clinical trial
    Doses stated in the abstract: 2 mg
    Total cholesterol (-0.3±0.6 mmol/L) and non-HDL cholesterol (-0.3±0.5 mmol/L) significantly decreased from baseline to Week 12 in the tesamorelin 2 mg group (p Conclusions Treatment of type 2 diabetic patients with tesamorelin for 12 weeks did not alter insulin response or glycemic control.
    Source pmid-28617838 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 28 2014 Human clinical trial
    Doses stated in the abstract: 2 mg; 9 mg/d; 5-13 mg/d
    Participants were randomized to receive tesamorelin, 2 mg (n=28), or placebo (n=22), subcutaneously daily for 6 months.
    Source pmid-25038357 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added

Adverse events and frequency

Events and their frequency as each study reported them, with the denominator where the abstract gives one.

  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 38 2024 Human clinical trial
    Tesamorelin was well tolerated with a similar frequency of adverse events, including hyperglycemia, between groups.
    Source pmid-38905488 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 61 2019 Human clinical trial
    Individuals in the tesamorelin group experienced more localised injection site complaints than those in the placebo group, though none were judged to be serious.
    Source pmid-31611038 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 273 2008 Human clinical trial
    Tesamorelin was generally well tolerated.
    Source pmid-18690162 · quoted verbatim from the abstract

Study durations

Treatment and follow-up periods as stated in each abstract.

  • Clinical trial humans n = 22 2026 Human clinical trial
    Durations stated: 10 weeks
    In a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial, we assessed 22 subjects with baseline cognition ranging from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment before and after 10 weeks of treatment with low-dose tesamorelin (1 mg; GHRH analog) or placebo.
    Source pmid-42382101 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 61 2019 Human clinical trial
    Durations stated: 12 months; 6 month
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either tesamorelin 2 mg once daily or placebo once daily for 12 months, followed by a 6-month open-label phase during which all participants received tesamorelin 2 mg daily.
    Source pmid-31611038 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 193 2019 Human clinical trial
    Durations stated: 26 weeks
    Differences between muscle area and density before and after 26 weeks of tesamorelin or placebo treatment were compared and linear regression models were adjusted for baseline and treatment arm.
    Source pmid-31237318 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 53 2017 Human clinical trial
    Durations stated: 12 week; 12 weeks
    No significant differences were observed between groups in relative insulin response over the 12-week treatment period.
    Source pmid-28617838 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 28 2014 Human clinical trial
    Durations stated: 6 months; 2 weeks
    Participants were randomized to receive tesamorelin, 2 mg (n=28), or placebo (n=22), subcutaneously daily for 6 months.
    Source pmid-25038357 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 152 2012 Human clinical trial
    Durations stated: 20 weeks; 10 week
    Participants self-administered daily subcutaneous injections of tesamorelin (Theratechnologies Inc),a stabilized analog of human GHRH (1 mg/d), or placebo 30 minutes before bedtime for 20 weeks.
    Source pmid-22869065 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added

Routes studied

Routes of administration named in each study.

  • Phase 1 clinical trial humans n = 41 2015 Human clinical trial
    administration by subcutaneous route reported
    A total of 41 subjects in Phase I trials receiving subcutaneous daily doses of 1 or 2 mg of tesamorelin during 14 consecutive days were included in this analysis.
    Source pmid-25895899 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans 2015 Human clinical trial
    administration by subcutaneous route reported
    A total of 38 HIV-infected patients and healthy subjects receiving subcutaneous tesamorelin doses of 1 or 2 mg administered daily during 14 consecutive days were included in the analysis.
    Source pmid-25358450 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 28 2014 Human clinical trial
    administration by subcutaneous route reported
    Participants were randomized to receive tesamorelin, 2 mg (n=28), or placebo (n=22), subcutaneously daily for 6 months.
    Source pmid-25038357 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 152 2012 Human clinical trial
    administration by subcutaneous route reported
    Participants self-administered daily subcutaneous injections of tesamorelin (Theratechnologies Inc),a stabilized analog of human GHRH (1 mg/d), or placebo 30 minutes before bedtime for 20 weeks.
    Source pmid-22869065 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans 2012 Human clinical trial
    administration by subcutaneous route reported
    IGF-I increased (86 ± 21 vs. -6 ± 8 μg/liter; 92 (+52, +132) μg/liter; P Conclusion Among obese subjects with relative reductions in GH, tesamorelin selectively reduces VAT without significant effects on sc adipose tissue and improves triglycerides, C-reactive protein, and cIMT, without aggravating glucose.
    Source pmid-23015655 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 273 2011 Human clinical trial
    administration by subcutaneous route reported
    Design and methods Four hundred and ten HIV-infected patients with abdominal adiposity were randomized to 2 mg tesamorelin (n = 273) or placebo (n = 137) subcutaneously daily for 26 weeks.
    Source pmid-21516030 · quoted verbatim from the abstract

Biomarkers measured in studies

Laboratory and clinical measures the studies report tracking, including which hormones did and did not change.

  • Randomized controlled trial humans 2021 Human clinical trial
    This study used proteomics and gene set enrichment analysis to assess effects of a GH releasing hormone (GHRH) analog, tesamorelin, on circulating immune markers and liver tissue in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PWH) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
    Source pmid-33852720 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 58 2021 Human clinical trial
    We leveraged a randomized trial of the growth hormone-releasing hormone analogue tesamorelin to treat NAFLD in HIV.
    Source pmid-32270862 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans 2020 Human clinical trial
    In a recent randomized placebo-controlled trial, we demonstrated that the growth hormone-releasing hormone analog tesamorelin reduced liver fat and prevented fibrosis progression in HIV-associated NAFLD over 1 year.
    Source pmid-32701508 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 193 2019 Human clinical trial
    Tesamorelin, a growth hormone-releasing hormone analogue, decreases visceral adipose tissue in people living with HIV, however, the effects on skeletal muscle fat and area are unknown.
    Source pmid-31237318 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans 2017 Human clinical trial
    Tesamorelin, a growth hormone releasing hormone agonist, reduces liver fat in HIV-infected individuals.
    Source pmid-29031905 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 53 2017 Human clinical trial
    The objective of this study was to determine whether tesamorelin, a stabilized growth hormone-releasing hormone analogue, would alter insulin sensitivity or control of diabetes.
    Source pmid-28617838 · quoted verbatim from the abstract

Reported timelines

Onset, peak and duration figures as each study reported them.

  • Clinical trial humans n = 22 2026 Human clinical trial
    In a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial, we assessed 22 subjects with baseline cognition ranging from normal cognition to mild cognitive impairment before and after 10 weeks of treatment with low-dose tesamorelin (1 mg; GHRH analog) or placebo.
    Source pmid-42382101 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 193 2019 Human clinical trial
    Differences between muscle area and density before and after 26 weeks of tesamorelin or placebo treatment were compared and linear regression models were adjusted for baseline and treatment arm.
    Source pmid-31237318 · quoted verbatim from the abstract

Storage and stability

Stability and storage conditions as reported.

  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 53 2017 Human clinical trial
    The objective of this study was to determine whether tesamorelin, a stabilized growth hormone-releasing hormone analogue, would alter insulin sensitivity or control of diabetes.
    Source pmid-28617838 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 152 2012 Human clinical trial
    Participants self-administered daily subcutaneous injections of tesamorelin (Theratechnologies Inc),a stabilized analog of human GHRH (1 mg/d), or placebo 30 minutes before bedtime for 20 weeks.
    Source pmid-22869065 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
Method note · shared across compounds

Reconstitution mathematics

Lyophilised peptide is supplied as a mass in a vial and dissolved in a stated volume of diluent. Two figures follow from that and nothing else:

  • Concentration = mass in vial ÷ diluent volume. A 5 mg vial in 2 mL is 2.5 mg/mL, or 2,500 mcg/mL.
  • Volume for a given mass = that mass ÷ concentration. 250 mcg at 2,500 mcg/mL is 0.1 mL. On a U-100 insulin syringe, where 1 mL is 100 units, that is 10 units.

Study doses on this page are quoted as published, in the units the authors used. Converting between mcg, mg and IU, or between a mass and a syringe volume, is arithmetic; deciding a mass is not, and this page does not do it. The reconstitution calculator performs the conversion with the formula shown.

Method note · shared across compounds

Reading a certificate of analysis

A certificate of analysis is a laboratory report on one batch. Reading it means checking four things in order.

  1. Identity. Mass spectrometry should report an observed molecular mass matching the peptide's theoretical mass within the instrument's stated tolerance. A certificate with no mass spectrometry, or one that lists only the expected value, has not confirmed identity.
  2. Purity. HPLC purity is the area of the main peak as a share of all peaks, at a stated wavelength. It says nothing about what the other peaks are, and it is not a measure of quantity.
  3. Quantity. Net peptide content, by amino acid analysis or UV, is the fraction of the vial's mass that is peptide rather than counter-ions and water. A 5 mg vial at 80% net content holds 4 mg of peptide, and every concentration figure above changes accordingly.
  4. Provenance. The batch number on the certificate should match the vial, the laboratory should be named and independent of the seller, and the test date should be recent.

This page rates no supplier and links to none. It describes how to read the document.

Method note · shared across compounds

Equipment described in studies

Published human studies of injectable peptides report the same small set of materials: single-use insulin syringes with fixed needles, most often U-100 with 29 to 31 gauge needles; bacteriostatic water or sterile water for injection as diluent, with the choice stated in the methods; alcohol swabs; and refrigerated storage of reconstituted solution. Animal studies more often report intraperitoneal or intragastric administration and state the vehicle used. Where a study in this record's ledger names its materials or vehicle, that sentence appears under storage or routes above; where it does not, nothing is assumed here.

Other compounds in its class

Same class in the registry: CJC-1295, Sermorelin. Each row shows what that compound's own record states; nothing is inferred across rows. Head-to-head evidence, where any exists, is on the comparison pages: Sermorelin vs Tesamorelin, Ipamorelin vs Tesamorelin.

3 compounds in the ghrh analogs class. Each row states what that compound's own record says; nothing is inferred across rows.
CompoundTierPublicationsRCTsRecord
Tesamorelin Approved label 115 22 draft
CJC-1295 Human clinical trial 37 1 draft
Sermorelin Approved label 579 39 draft

Studied in combination

Whether any indexed study tested Tesamorelin together with the compounds it is commonly combined with. A count of zero is the finding, not a gap in this page.

Regulatory status

Registry facts only. Jurisdiction-level status, compounding categories and sport prohibitions need their own cited documents before they appear here.

  • ChEMBL CHEMBL1237026: maximum clinical phase 4, first approval 2010, ATC H01AC06. Jurisdiction-level status pending human review.Approved label
    Registry entry

Open questions and limitations

What is genuinely unknown, stated plainly. A missing field is not evidence that the outcome is safe, effective, or established.

  • No study in this record's ledger reports weight-normalized doses for Tesamorelin.
  • No study in this record's ledger reports dose-escalation schedules for Tesamorelin.
  • No study in this record's ledger reports interactions with other agents for Tesamorelin.
  • No study in this record's ledger reports exclusion criteria for Tesamorelin.

Questions people ask

Has Tesamorelin been tested in humans?

Yes. Europe PMC indexes 7 clinical trials and 22 randomized controlled trials naming Tesamorelin or a listed alias in the title or abstract. The evidence table above lists the ones in this record's ledger with their design and sample size; check the study name, since an alias can refer to a different formulation of the same molecule.

What kind of evidence exists for Tesamorelin?

The strongest tier is approved label: an approved medicine with a regulator-reviewed label. Every claim on this page carries its own tier, because a compound with one human trial and forty animal studies is described by both facts, not the better one.

Is Tesamorelin an approved medicine?

ChEMBL records CHEMBL1237026 at maximum clinical phase 4, first approved 2010. Approval status differs by jurisdiction and is pending human review on this record.

Which species has Tesamorelin been studied in?

Studies in this record's ledger report work in: Humans, Swine. Findings in one species do not transfer to another, and weight-normalized doses in particular do not scale linearly between them.

Sources

Full citations. Every claim above links to one of these by its id.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
Show the remaining 15 sources
  1. 13
  2. 14
  3. 15
  4. 16
  5. 17
  6. 18
  7. 19
  8. 20
  9. 21
    Growth hormone in the aging male.
    pmid-24054930 · · peer-reviewed
  10. 22
  11. 23
  12. 24
    How to diagnose a lipodystrophy syndrome.
    pmid-22748602 · · peer-reviewed
  13. 25
  14. 26
  15. 27

Reference card

Reference card · generated /compounds/tesamorelin
Compound
Tesamorelin, ghrh analogs
Evidence tier
Approved label
Indexed publications
115 · 22 RCTs · 7 other clinical trials
Approval
approved (2010) · ATC H01AC06
Routes reported
subcutaneous

Study figures are as published in each source and are not recommendations. Print or save this card with its date.

Last reviewed and what changed

Newest first. These are the record's own revision dates, and the same dates feed the sitemap.

  1. · Claims drafted extractively from 27 ledger sources by scripts/draft_claims.py: 31 claims, 22 evidence-table rows. Status researched -> draft.
  2. · Claims drafted extractively from 27 ledger sources by scripts/draft_claims.py: 39 claims, 22 evidence-table rows. Status researched -> draft.
  3. · Metadata refreshed by scripts/fetch_evidence.py --refresh-meta: tier human-clinical-trial -> approved-label; chembl None -> CHEMBL1237026.
  4. · Evidence fetched from Europe PMC and ChEMBL by scripts/fetch_evidence.py; claims not yet written.