Dashnaiv Peptides
Compounds·mitochondrial peptides·cardiolipin-binding, inner-membrane targeted

SS-31 (elamipretide) peptide: the trials behind the 2025 approval, the trials that missed, and what the gray-market use rests on

What 493 indexed publications and 16 randomized trials actually state about ss-31, sentence by sentence, each tied to its source and labeled by the kind of evidence it is.

Approved label Reviewed 34 sources Updated Also: Bendavia, Elamipretida, Elamipretide

At a glance

Evidence availability
Approved label
Regulator-reviewed label exists
Indexed publications
493
Europe PMC, title or abstract, 2026-09-14
Human studies in ledger
16
11 randomized; study count, not efficacy proof
Approval
2025
ChEMBL phase 4
Routes reported
intravenous, oral, subcutaneous, topical
from studies in this ledger
Studied in
Humans, Mice, Rats, Swine
25 primary studies in the evidence table
Reviewed by Adam Mirando, PharmD, on . What changed

What SS-31 is, and why it is also called elamipretide and Forzinity

SS-31 is a peptide in the mitochondrial peptides class (cardiolipin-binding, inner-membrane targeted). Europe PMC indexes 493 publications naming it or a listed alias in a title or abstract, including 16 randomized controlled trials and 14 clinical trials of any design, as of . The strongest evidence tier in that literature is human clinical trials.

This page reports what those studies state, sentence by sentence, with each statement tied to its source and labeled by the kind of evidence it is. It does not recommend use, and it does not translate study doses into anything personal.

What the evidence level means

Publication counts show what is indexed, not how strong the evidence is. The ledger below separates human clinical records from preclinical, analytical, and in-vitro work.

Human clinical studies in this ledger1611 randomized · 5 other human clinical
Evidence strengthNot yet assessedSeparate from evidence availability
Efficacy signalNot yet assessedRead the study result, not the tier alone

Interpretation boundary: An indexed publication count is a discovery measure. It does not establish efficacy, safety, approval, or a personal treatment plan.

SS-31 in two minutes

What it is. The research name of elamipretide, a synthetic four-amino-acid peptide that binds cardiolipin in the inner mitochondrial membrane. Since 19 September 2025 it has been an FDA-approved medicine, Forzinity, for muscle strength in Barth syndrome.

What the research actually shows. 493 indexed publications and 16 randomized trials. In Barth syndrome, a 12-patient crossover trial missed its primary endpoints in the randomized phase, then showed sustained gains in walking distance and heart volumes over 168 weeks of open-label treatment, and beat a natural-history comparison group; that is the approval. In mitochondrial myopathy, a 218-patient phase 3 trial found no effect on either primary endpoint. In heart failure and two eye diseases, primary endpoints were missed.

Dose in the trials. 40 mg once daily by subcutaneous injection, for 4 to 168 weeks; the first trial used intravenous infusion by body weight.

Safety record. Injection-site reactions in up to 80% of treated participants, mostly mild; nothing else has separated from placebo across the programme.

Where the evidence is thinnest. The gray-market use. One trial gave healthy older adults a single infusion: muscle ATP capacity rose for hours and fatigue did not change. No study has tested months of use in anyone without a mitochondrial disease, or the pairing with MOTS-c.

Editorial synthesis Written from general pharmacology, the development record and what is commonly reported; not a cited finding. Cited findings on this page carry their own tier.

How SS-31 works: cardiolipin, not antioxidant scavenging

Written from general pharmacology and the development record, and marked as editorial synthesis; the measurements behind it are quoted in the biomarker section.

  • SS-31 is elamipretide, a four-amino-acid synthetic peptide (D-arginine, dimethyltyrosine, lysine, phenylalanine) from the Szeto-Schiller series designed at Cornell in the early 2000s. Its alternating positive and aromatic residues let it cross cell membranes and concentrate a thousandfold in the inner mitochondrial membrane, where it binds cardiolipin, the lipid that holds the respiratory-chain complexes in their working arrangement and that is abnormal in Barth syndrome.Editorial synthesis
    Editorial synthesis from general knowledge
  • The proposed effect is structural rather than chemical: by binding cardiolipin it is thought to stabilise cristae, keep cytochrome c in its electron-carrying role rather than its peroxidase role, and so raise ATP output while lowering the reactive oxygen produced by a leaking chain. Early papers called it an antioxidant; the developers' later work describes it as a cardiolipin-protective compound, and the older-adult trial is the human demonstration: ATP capacity up within hours of one infusion, then back to baseline.Editorial synthesis
    Editorial synthesis from general knowledge
  • What is not established is durable benefit outside cardiolipin disorders. The mechanism predicts the largest effect where cardiolipin is most abnormal, which is Barth syndrome, and the trial record matches: the Barth programme produced the approval, while the genotypically mixed myopathy trial, the heart-failure trial and the eye trials did not meet their primary endpoints.Editorial synthesis
    Editorial synthesis from general knowledge

Trial by trial: what elamipretide did and did not do

Every human study in the ledger, with its verdict in the last column. Read the primary-endpoint column before the open-label one.

Human studies of elamipretide (SS-31) in the ledger, in order of size.
TrialPopulationDose and durationPrimary endpointResult
MMPOWER-3 (Karaa 2023)218 adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy40 mg/day SC, 24 weeks6-minute walk; fatigue scoreMissed both. Walk distance -3.2 m vs placebo; well tolerated
Older-adult trial (Roshanravan 2021)39 healthy adults aged 60 to 85 with poorly functioning muscle mitochondriaSingle 2-hour IV infusionMuscle ATP capacityMet, transiently. ATPmax up immediately, gone by day 7; no effect on fatigue resistance
MMPOWER (Karaa 2018)36 adults with primary mitochondrial myopathyIV 0.01, 0.1 or 0.25 mg/kg/h for 2 h, 5 days6-minute walk at day 5Borderline. Highest dose +64.5 m vs +20.4 m placebo (p 0.053); dose-response significant
MMPOWER-2 (Karaa 2020)30 adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy40 mg/day SC, 4 weeks, crossover6-minute walkMissed (+19.8 m, p 0.08); fatigue scores improved; injection-site reactions 80%
EMBRACE substudy (Hortmann 2019)19 patients after heart attack, 10 treatedNot stated in abstractSerum HtrA2 (biomarker)Biomarker fell; no clinical outcome
TAZPOWER (Reid Thompson 2021)12 males with Barth syndrome40 mg/day SC, 12 weeks each arm, crossover6-minute walk; symptom scoreMissed both in the randomized phase; at 36 weeks open-label +95.9 m and better symptoms
TAZPOWER extension (Thompson 2024)10 entered, 8 completed40 mg/day SC, 168 weeksSafetyWell tolerated; cumulative +96.1 m walk; heart volumes improved; cardiolipin ratio improved
Natural-history comparison (Hornby 2022)8 treated vs 19 untreated Barth patients40 mg/day SC6-minute walk at 64 and 76 weeks+79.7 m and +91.0 m vs untreated; strength up. Not randomized
LHON eye drops (Karanjia 2024)12 adults with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy1% topical, 52 weeks, one or both eyesVisual acuityMissed; well tolerated; post hoc visual-field signal
Expanded access (Koenig 2023; Ansari 2024; Ortmann 2025)Children under 12; two adults with eye-predominant disorders; one newbornNewborn: IV 0.25 then 0.5 mg/kg daily, then SCNone (case reports)Reported improvements; no controls

Two trials the ledger does not yet hold complete the record: PROGRESS-HF in heart failure (no change in left-ventricular volume at 28 days) and ReCLAIM-2 in dry macular degeneration (primary endpoints missed, per the sponsor). Neither produced an approval.

Editorial synthesis Written from general pharmacology, the development record and what is commonly reported; not a cited finding. Cited findings on this page carry their own tier.

What the evidence shows

One row per primary study in this record's ledger. Fields are read from each paper's indexing and abstract. "Analytical method" marks papers about detecting or measuring the compound rather than about its effects.

25 primary studies in this record's ledger, strongest evidence first. A dash means the abstract did not state the value.
StudyDesignnSpeciesDoseRouteDurationReported outcomeTier
Gwaltney 2025 Randomized controlled trial 12 Humans—subcutaneous— — Human clinical trial
Karaa 2024 Randomized controlled trial — Humans——— The mtDNA replisome post-hoc cohort displayed an improvement on the 6MWT, trending towards significant, in the elamipretide group when compared with placebo (25.2 ± 8.7 m versus 2.0 ± 8.6 m for placebo group; p = 0.06). Human clinical trial
Thompson 2024 Randomized controlled trial — Humans40 mgsubcutaneous28 week; 168 week Elamipretide was associated with sustained long-term tolerability and efficacy, with improvements in functional assessments and cardiac function in BTHS. Human clinical trial
Karanjia 2024 Randomized controlled trial 12 Humans—topical52 week; 52 weeks The change from baseline in BCVA in elamipretide-treated eyes was not significantly different from the vehicle eyes at any time point. Human clinical trial
Karaa 2023 Randomized controlled trial 218 Humans40 mg/dsubcutaneous24 weeks Discussion Subcutaneous elamipretide treatment did not improve outcomes in the 6MWT and PMMSA TFS in patients with PMM. Human clinical trial
Van 2023 Randomized controlled trial 12 Humans——— — Human clinical trial
Koenig 2023 Clinical trial — Humans——12 years In clinical trials, elamipretide produced clinical and functional improvements in adults and adolescents with mitochondrial disorders, such as primary mitochondrial myopathy and Barth syndrome; however, experience in… Human clinical trial
Hornby 2022 Phase 3 clinical trial 8 Humans40 mg daily—— Significant improvements in muscle strength (secondary endpoint), as assessed by handheld dynamometry (HHD) were also observed with elamipretide, with LS mean differences of 40.8 Newtons at 64 weeks (P = 0.0002) and… Human clinical trial
Roshanravan 2021 Randomized controlled trial — Humans——— No difference was found on day 7 after treatment, which is consistent with the half-life of ELAM in human blood. Human clinical trial
Reid 2021 Randomized controlled trial 12 Humans40 mg per day—12 weeks; 4 week In this interventional clinical trial in BTHS, daily administration of elamipretide led to improvement in BTHS symptoms. Human clinical trial
Karaa 2020 Randomized controlled trial 30 Humans40 mg/daysubcutaneous4 weeks; 4 week Participants who received a short-course treatment of daily SC elamipretide for 4 weeks experienced a clinically meaningful change in the 6MWT, which did not achieve statistical significance as the primary endpoint of… Human clinical trial
Hortmann 2019 Randomized controlled trial 19 Humans——— Elamipretide significantly reduced the HtrA2 median serum level after myocardial infarction 1805.5 (981.3-2220.1) pg/mL vs. 496.5 (379.4-703.8) pg/mL ( P ⩽0.05). Human clinical trial
Karaa 2018 Randomized controlled trial 36 Humans—intravenous5 days In addition, there was a dose-dependent increase in distance walked on the 6MWT with elamipretide treatment ( p = 0.014). Human clinical trial
Duan 2025 Human study — Humans——— Additionally, SS-31 reduced NOS2 expression by 50%, highlighting its therapeutic potential in age-related bone loss. Observational, human
Ortmann 2025 Case report — Humans0.25 mg/kg; 0.5 mg/kgintravenous, oral, subcutaneous— On day of life (DOL) 34, therapy with daily IV elamipretide (0.25 mg/kg increased to 0.5 mg/kg on DOL39) began, followed by standard-of-care oral heart failure medications. Observational, human
Ansari 2024 Human study — Humans——— Elamipretide was well tolerated and both patients demonstrated improvement in symptoms while on therapy. Observational, human
Yang 2026 Animal study — Mice——— Co-administration of SS-31 and NMN significantly attenuated post-ischemic brain damage and ameliorated neurological deficits (P < 0.0001), demonstrating effects markedly superior to either monotherapy. Animal, preclinical
Xiong 2026 Animal study — Mice——— Mechanistically, single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals that SS-31 increased the maternal mRNA degradation, and the levels of genes associated with mitochondrial function and mitophagy in aged oocytes, such as… Animal, preclinical
Vieira 2026 Animal study — Mice——— We therefore tested whether elamipretide, a synthetic cardiolipin-binding peptide, could improve mitochondrial function and cardiolipin levels in βTFP-deficient mice and patient-derived fibroblasts. Animal, preclinical
Jiang 2026 Animal study — Rats, Mice——— Treatment with SS-31 substantially improved survival rates, reduced neurological deficits, and lowered serum NSE and S100B levels. Animal, preclinical
Kan 2025 Animal study — Rats——— SS-31 pretreatment attenuated eGC degradation, reduced neuroinflammation, and restored PSD-95 levels, suggesting its potential protective role. eGC degradation is a key intermediary linking systemic inflammation to… Animal, preclinical
Nguyen 2025 Animal study — Swine——— Oocytes cultured in medium with 1 µM SS-31 exhibited higher maturation and blastocyst formation rates than the control (0 µM) (78.3 ± 3.8% vs. 55.2 ± 4.1% and 7.6 ± 1.6% vs. 2.8 ± 1.8%, respectively). Animal, preclinical
Nie 2023 Animal study — Mice——— Impressively, the expression percentage of IL-1β and IL-18 was downregulated to lower than half with SS-31 treatment. Animal, preclinical
Fan 2026 In vitro study — ———3 days SS-31 also prevented increases in the p16, p21, and SASP markers and mitigated mitochondrial ROS production. Mechanistic, in vitro
Pharaoh 2023 In vitro study — ———— Protein abundance in the ADP/ATP transport and synthesis pathway was unchanged, but ELAM treatment decreased protein s-glutathionylation incuding of ANT. Mechanistic, in vitro

Doses reported in studies

Each entry is a sentence quoted from the study's abstract, with the study's design, sample size and year in front of it. Comparator doses in the same sentence are not attributed to ss-31.

  • Randomized controlled trial humans 2024 Human clinical trial
    Doses stated in the abstract: 40 mg
    Patients entering the OLE continued elamipretide 40 mg subcutaneous daily.
    Source pmid-38602181 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 218 2023 Human clinical trial
    Doses stated in the abstract: 40 mg/d
    After screening, eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either 24 weeks of elamipretide at a dose of 40 mg/d or placebo subcutaneously.
    Source pmid-37268435 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Phase 3 clinical trial humans n = 8 2022 Human clinical trial
    Doses stated in the abstract: 40 mg daily
    A phase 3, observational, retrospective, and non-interventional study was designed to establish a natural history control (NHC) cohort of patients with Barth syndrome (BTHS) to provide further analysis of the efficacy of elamipretide observed in an open-label extension (OLE) phase of the TAZPOWER trial, a clinical trial that tested the efficacy of 40 mg daily of elamipretide in patients with BTHS.
    Source pmid-36056411 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 12 2021 Human clinical trial
    Doses stated in the abstract: 40 mg per day
    In part 1, 12 subjects were randomized to 40 mg per day of elamipretide or placebo for 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week washout and then 12 weeks on the opposite arm.
    Source pmid-33077895 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 30 2020 Human clinical trial
    Doses stated in the abstract: 40 mg/day
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to 40 mg/day SC elamipretide for 4 weeks followed by placebo SC for 4 weeks, separated by a 4-week washout period, or the opposite sequence.
    Source pmid-32096613 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Case report humans 2025 Observational, human
    Doses stated in the abstract: 0.25 mg/kg; 0.5 mg/kg
    On day of life (DOL) 34, therapy with daily IV elamipretide (0.25 mg/kg increased to 0.5 mg/kg on DOL39) began, followed by standard-of-care oral heart failure medications.
    Source pmid-39917770 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added

Every SS-31 dose in the trials and on the label, in one table

Every figure here is a trial dose or the approved label. The research-chemical figures that circulate were not derived from them and are not reproduced.

Doses of elamipretide administered in studies and stated on the label.
SourceRouteDoseFrequency and durationPopulation
Forzinity label (2025)SubcutaneousWeight-gated: patients of at least 30 kg; 80 mg/mL solutionOnce dailyBarth syndrome; dose reduced by half in severe kidney impairment per label
MMPOWER-2, MMPOWER-3, TAZPOWER and extensionSubcutaneous40 mgOnce daily, 4 to 168 weeksMitochondrial myopathy; Barth syndrome
MMPOWER (2018)Intravenous0.01, 0.1 or 0.25 mg/kg per hour over 2 hoursDaily for 5 daysMitochondrial myopathy
Older-adult trial (2021)IntravenousSingle 2-hour infusion; dose not stated in the abstractOnceHealthy adults 60 to 85
LHON trial (2024)Topical eye drops1% solutionDaily, 52 weeks plus extensionLeber hereditary optic neuropathy
Newborn case report (2025)Intravenous, then subcutaneous0.25 mg/kg, raised to 0.5 mg/kgDaily from day 34 of lifeBarth syndrome, infant

The trial dose is the label dose in kind: 40 mg once a day under the skin. Vendor pages for 'SS-31 peptide' quote figures that are a fraction of it, chosen without any study; they are not reproduced here. Nothing on this page is an instruction to take anything.

Editorial synthesis Written from general pharmacology, the development record and what is commonly reported; not a cited finding. Cited findings on this page carry their own tier.

Side effects: what the placebo-controlled trials recorded

From randomized trials with a placebo arm, so the frequencies mean something. Injection-site reactions dominate; nothing else has separated from placebo. Events and their frequency as each study reported them, with the denominator where the abstract gives one.

  • Randomized controlled trial humans 2024 Human clinical trial
    Elamipretide was well tolerated, with injection-site reactions being the most common adverse events.
    Source pmid-38602181 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 12 2024 Human clinical trial
    The primary outcome measure was assessment of adverse events (AEs) from the administration of topical elamipretide, and the primary efficacy end point was change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).
    Source pmid-37923251 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 218 2023 Human clinical trial
    Elamipretide treatment was well-tolerated with most adverse events being mild to moderate in severity.
    Source pmid-37268435 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 30 2020 Human clinical trial
    Injection site reactions were the most commonly reported adverse events with elamipretide (80%), the majority of which were mild.
    Source pmid-32096613 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Human study humans 2024 Observational, human
    Elamipretide was well tolerated and both patients demonstrated improvement in symptoms while on therapy.
    Source pmid-39619320 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Trials that did not reach the ledger: PROGRESS-HF (2020) gave elamipretide to people with heart failure for 28 days and found no change in left-ventricular volume, its primary endpoint; ReCLAIM-2 tested it in dry age-related macular degeneration and, by the sponsor's report, missed its primary endpoints. Neither reported a safety signal beyond injection-site reactions. They are cited here from public summaries and are pending sources.Editorial synthesis
    Editorial synthesis from general knowledge · primary document to be added to the ledger
  • No trial has given elamipretide to healthy people for longer than a single infusion, so the safety of months of use for energy or longevity is unmeasured. The disease trials ran up to 168 weeks in Barth syndrome (eight patients) and 24 weeks in 109 people with mitochondrial myopathy.Editorial synthesis
    Editorial synthesis from general knowledge

Who SS-31 is discussed for, and the cautions that recur

Approved for: people with Barth syndrome weighing at least 30 kg, to improve muscle strength. Studied and not approved for: primary mitochondrial myopathy, heart failure, dry macular degeneration, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, healthy older adults. Community: people seeking energy, longevity or recovery, for whom no trial exists.

The cautions come from the trial record and the label, not from a contraindication list:

  • Injection-site reactions. Up to 80% of treated participants in MMPOWER-2 and the most common event in every subcutaneous trial. Mostly mild; the one consistent finding.
  • Kidney impairment. The label halves the dose in severe renal impairment, which means the kidney matters to its clearance; anyone with reduced kidney function has a reason to read the label rather than a forum.
  • Expecting a longevity effect. The one trial in healthy older adults found a transient change in a muscle-energetics measurement and no functional benefit.
  • Expecting a myopathy effect. The 218-patient trial found none on its primary endpoints; a post hoc analysis suggested benefit in the nuclear-DNA subgroup, which is a hypothesis for the next trial, not a result.
  • Children and pregnancy. Children under 30 kg are outside the label; use below that weight exists only as expanded-access case reports. No pregnancy data.
  • Research-chemical vials. As with every unapproved product on this site's compound list, Composition, sterility and dose are unverified; the approved product is a prescription medicine.

Editorial synthesis Written from general pharmacology, the development record and what is commonly reported; not a cited finding. Cited findings on this page carry their own tier.

Biomarkers measured in studies

Laboratory and clinical measures the studies report tracking, including which hormones did and did not change.

  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 218 2023 Human clinical trial
    Between the participants receiving elamipretide and those receiving placebo, the difference in the least squares mean (SE) from baseline to week 24 on distance walked on the 6MWT was -3.2 (95% CI -18.7 to 12.3; p = 0.69) meters, and on the PMMSA, the total fatigue score was -0.07 (95% CI -0.10 to 0.26; p = 0.37).
    Source pmid-37268435 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Phase 3 clinical trial humans n = 8 2022 Human clinical trial
    For the 6-min walk test (6MWT, primary endpoint), the least squares (LS) mean difference between groups was 79.7 m (P = 0.0004) at week 64 and 91.0 m (P = 0.0005) at week 76 in favor of elamipretide.
    Source pmid-36056411 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 19 2019 Human clinical trial
    Elamipretide significantly reduced the HtrA2 median serum level after myocardial infarction 1805.5 (981.3-2220.1) pg/mL vs. 496.5 (379.4-703.8) pg/mL ( P ⩽0.05).
    Source pmid-28534645 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Animal study mice 2026 Animal, preclinical
    In contrast, SS-31 reduced oocyte aneuploidy, ROS accumulation and DNA damage.
    Source pmid-41612464 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Animal study mice 2026 Animal, preclinical
    We therefore tested whether elamipretide, a synthetic cardiolipin-binding peptide, could improve mitochondrial function and cardiolipin levels in βTFP-deficient mice and patient-derived fibroblasts.
    Source pmid-41500837 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Animal study rats, mice 2026 Animal, preclinical
    In vitro experiments were performed on BV2 cells subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation, assessing cell viability, lipid peroxidation, ferroptosis-associated protein expression, and cytokine secretion following SS-31 intervention.
    Source pmid-41136322 · quoted verbatim from the abstract

Reported interactions

Sentences in which the compound is studied alongside another agent. Read the quotation: the word interaction can also be statistical.

  • Animal study mice 2026 Animal, preclinical
    Co-administration of SS-31 and NMN significantly attenuated post-ischemic brain damage and ameliorated neurological deficits (P < 0.0001), demonstrating effects markedly superior to either monotherapy.
    Source pmid-42443448 · quoted verbatim from the abstract

Reported timelines

Onset, peak and duration figures as each study reported them.

  • A single two-hour infusion raised muscle mitochondrial ATP capacity immediately; by day 7 the effect had gone, which the authors attributed to the drug's short half-life in human blood.Human clinical trial
    Source pmid-34264994
  • In the dose-finding trial, walking distance rose within five days of treatment.Human clinical trial
    Source pmid-29500292
  • In Barth syndrome, neither primary endpoint moved in 12 weeks of randomized treatment; at 36 weeks of open-label treatment walking distance had improved by 95.9 metres.Human clinical trial
    Source pmid-33077895

What is measured over time, and what is not

Elamipretide's time course is unusually well documented. Hours: muscle ATP capacity rose during a two-hour infusion and had returned to baseline by day 7. Five days: a dose-dependent gain in walking distance in the first myopathy trial. Four to 24 weeks: no significant gain in walking distance in the two larger myopathy trials. Twelve weeks: no gain in the randomized Barth phase. 36 to 168 weeks: steadily accumulating gains in walking distance, strength and heart volumes in the Barth extension, in eight to ten patients without a placebo arm. The pattern the developers draw from this is that cardiolipin repair takes months in the disease it fits and does not happen where cardiolipin is not the problem. What has never been measured is any outcome in a healthy person beyond one infusion.

Editorial synthesis Written from general pharmacology, the development record and what is commonly reported; not a cited finding. Cited findings on this page carry their own tier.

Escalation schedules used in studies

How trials stepped doses, reported as study design.

  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 36 2018 Human clinical trial
    Participants were randomized to intravenous elamipretide (0.01, 0.1, and 0.25 mg/kg/h or placebo for 2 hours in a dose-escalating sequence).
    Source pmid-29500292 · quoted verbatim from the abstract

Study durations

Treatment and follow-up periods as stated in each abstract.

  • Randomized controlled trial humans 2024 Human clinical trial
    Durations stated: 28 week; 168 week
    TAZPOWER was a 28-week randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial followed by a 168-week OLE.
    Source pmid-38602181 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 12 2024 Human clinical trial
    Durations stated: 52 week; 52 weeks
    This phase II, prospective, randomized, vehicle-controlled, single-center clinical trial involved administration of elamipretide 1% topical ophthalmic solution to patients with LHON over a 52-week double-masked treatment period, followed by an open-label extension (OLE) for up to 108 additional weeks of treatment.
    Source pmid-37923251 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 218 2023 Human clinical trial
    Durations stated: 24 weeks
    After screening, eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either 24 weeks of elamipretide at a dose of 40 mg/d or placebo subcutaneously.
    Source pmid-37268435 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Clinical trial humans 2023 Human clinical trial
    Durations stated: 12 years
    In clinical trials, elamipretide produced clinical and functional improvements in adults and adolescents with mitochondrial disorders, such as primary mitochondrial myopathy and Barth syndrome; however, experience in younger patients is limited and to our knowledge, these are the first case reports on the safety and efficacy of elamipretide treatment in children under 12 years of age.
    Source pmid-36636586 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 12 2021 Human clinical trial
    Durations stated: 12 weeks; 4 week
    In part 1, 12 subjects were randomized to 40 mg per day of elamipretide or placebo for 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week washout and then 12 weeks on the opposite arm.
    Source pmid-33077895 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 30 2020 Human clinical trial
    Durations stated: 4 weeks; 4 week; 6 month
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to 40 mg/day SC elamipretide for 4 weeks followed by placebo SC for 4 weeks, separated by a 4-week washout period, or the opposite sequence.
    Source pmid-32096613 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added

Routes studied

Routes of administration named in each study.

  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 12 2025 Human clinical trial
    administration by subcutaneous route reported
    The BTHS-SA was administered in TAZPOWER, a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study to evaluate daily subcutaneous injections of elamipretide in subjects with genetically confirmed BTHS.
    Source pmid-40281531 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans 2024 Human clinical trial
    administration by subcutaneous route reported
    Patients entering the OLE continued elamipretide 40 mg subcutaneous daily.
    Source pmid-38602181 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 12 2024 Human clinical trial
    administration by topical route reported
    This study aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and potential efficacy of topical elamipretide in patients affected with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON).
    Source pmid-37923251 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 218 2023 Human clinical trial
    administration by subcutaneous route reported
    After screening, eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either 24 weeks of elamipretide at a dose of 40 mg/d or placebo subcutaneously.
    Source pmid-37268435 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 30 2020 Human clinical trial
    administration by subcutaneous route reported
    This study aims to evaluate the effect of subcutaneous (SC) elamipretide dosing on exercise performance using the 6 min walk test (6MWT), patient-reported outcomes measuring fatigue, functional assessments, and safety to guide the development of the Phase 3 trial.
    Source pmid-32096613 · quoted verbatim from the abstract
  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 36 2018 Human clinical trial
    administration by intravenous route reported
    Participants were randomized to intravenous elamipretide (0.01, 0.1, and 0.25 mg/kg/h or placebo for 2 hours in a dose-escalating sequence).
    Source pmid-29500292 · quoted verbatim from the abstract

Weight-normalized doses, as published

Per-kilogram figures exactly as each study published them, for the species it studied.

  • Case report humans 2025 Observational, human
    Weight-normalized doses as published: 0.25 mg/kg; 0.5 mg/kg
    On day of life (DOL) 34, therapy with daily IV elamipretide (0.25 mg/kg increased to 0.5 mg/kg on DOL39) began, followed by standard-of-care oral heart failure medications.
    Source pmid-39917770 · quoted verbatim from the abstract, emphasis added

Weight-normalized figures above are reproduced exactly as each study published them, for the species it studied. Dose does not scale linearly with body mass between species: metabolic rate, clearance and receptor density differ, and regulatory guidance uses allometric, not proportional, conversion. A mg/kg figure from a rat study is a fact about that rat study and nothing else.

What people report outside the literature

Forum reports describe use for energy, longevity and recovery, none of which has been tested in a trial. The 2021 older-adult trial is the closest thing to that use, and it found a transient effect on muscle energetics and none on fatigue. What circulates in user communities and clinic marketing, reported so a reader knows the figures and their origin. None of it has been tested in a trial, and none of it is a suggestion.

  • Outside the clinic, SS-31 circulates for energy, longevity, recovery and 'mitochondrial health', injected subcutaneously from research-chemical vials, often alongside MOTS-c or NAD+ precursors. Reported effects are more stamina and less brain fog; reported complaints are injection-site redness and, at higher amounts, nausea and dizziness. None of this comes from a study of that use. The nearest trial gave 39 healthy older adults one infusion and found a transient rise in muscle ATP capacity and no change in fatigue resistance. The doses on vendor pages were not derived from the trials, whose dose was 40 mg once daily under the skin, and are not reproduced here.Editorial synthesis
    Editorial synthesis from general knowledge
Method note · shared across compounds

Reconstitution mathematics

Lyophilised peptide is supplied as a mass in a vial and dissolved in a stated volume of diluent. Two figures follow from that and nothing else:

  • Concentration = mass in vial ÷ diluent volume. A 5 mg vial in 2 mL is 2.5 mg/mL, or 2,500 mcg/mL.
  • Volume for a given mass = that mass ÷ concentration. 250 mcg at 2,500 mcg/mL is 0.1 mL. On a U-100 insulin syringe, where 1 mL is 100 units, that is 10 units.

Study doses on this page are quoted as published, in the units the authors used. Converting between mcg, mg and IU, or between a mass and a syringe volume, is arithmetic; deciding a mass is not, and this page does not do it. The reconstitution calculator performs the conversion with the formula shown.

Method note · shared across compounds

Reading a certificate of analysis

A certificate of analysis is a laboratory report on one batch. Reading it means checking four things in order.

  1. Identity. Mass spectrometry should report an observed molecular mass matching the peptide's theoretical mass within the instrument's stated tolerance. A certificate with no mass spectrometry, or one that lists only the expected value, has not confirmed identity.
  2. Purity. HPLC purity is the area of the main peak as a share of all peaks, at a stated wavelength. It says nothing about what the other peaks are, and it is not a measure of quantity.
  3. Quantity. Net peptide content, by amino acid analysis or UV, is the fraction of the vial's mass that is peptide rather than counter-ions and water. A 5 mg vial at 80% net content holds 4 mg of peptide, and every concentration figure above changes accordingly.
  4. Provenance. The batch number on the certificate should match the vial, the laboratory should be named and independent of the seller, and the test date should be recent.

This page rates no supplier and links to none. It describes how to read the document.

Method note · shared across compounds

Equipment described in studies

Published human studies of injectable peptides report the same small set of materials: single-use insulin syringes with fixed needles, most often U-100 with 29 to 31 gauge needles; bacteriostatic water or sterile water for injection as diluent, with the choice stated in the methods; alcohol swabs; and refrigerated storage of reconstituted solution. Animal studies more often report intraperitoneal or intragastric administration and state the vehicle used. Where a study in this record's ledger names its materials or vehicle, that sentence appears under storage or routes above; where it does not, nothing is assumed here.

Storage and handling

Forzinity is supplied as a ready-to-use solution with storage and handling set out in its prescribing information, which this page does not reproduce. Lyophilised research-chemical vials follow vendor sheets, not the label, and their stability is untested.

Editorial synthesis Written from general pharmacology, the development record and what is commonly reported; not a cited finding. Cited findings on this page carry their own tier.

Common mistakes in how SS-31 is discussed

  1. Not knowing it is an approved drug. Most 'SS-31 peptide' pages were written before September 2025 or ignore it. The molecule in the vial is elamipretide, and its label exists.
  2. Reading the approval as proof for every use. It covers muscle strength in Barth syndrome, a cardiolipin disorder, and was granted on accelerated terms from a 12-patient trial plus extension and a natural-history comparison. The 218-patient myopathy trial missed.
  3. Calling it an antioxidant. It does not scavenge radicals; it binds a lipid and changes how the respiratory chain sits. Its developers stopped using the word.
  4. Quoting a longevity dose. No trial has dosed healthy people for more than one infusion. The daily figures that circulate come from forums, not from the programme.
  5. Pairing it with MOTS-c as if tested. No study has combined or sequenced them.
  6. Counting open-label gains as trial results. The Barth extension's 96-metre improvement had no placebo arm; the randomized phase of the same trial found nothing. Both facts belong in the same sentence.

Editorial synthesis Written from general pharmacology, the development record and what is commonly reported; not a cited finding. Cited findings on this page carry their own tier.

SS-31 vs MOTS-c, humanin, NAD+ precursors and CoQ10

SS-31 beside the compounds it is paired or compared with in mitochondrial discussions.
CompoundWhat it isHuman evidenceStatus
SS-31 (elamipretide)Synthetic tetrapeptide binding cardiolipinRandomized trials; approved for Barth syndrome 2025Prescription medicine (Forzinity); unapproved as a research chemical
MOTS-c16-amino-acid peptide encoded in mitochondrial DNA, acting on metabolism; 277 indexed publications4 randomized trials; 13 human studies in its ledgerNot approved; WADA S4.4
Humanin24-amino-acid mitochondrial-derived peptide; 589 indexed publications5 randomized trials; 17 human studies in its ledgerNot approved; research only
NAD+ precursors (NMN, NR)Oral supplements raising the coenzyme NAD+Small randomized trials of NAD+ levels; no disease approvalDietary supplements; no record on this site
Coenzyme Q10Electron carrier in the respiratory chainMany small trials in mitochondrial disease with inconsistent resultsDietary supplement; no record on this site

The pairing with MOTS-c that drives the comparison demand has no study behind it; the site's comparison pages list every pair that has been examined. One 2026 mouse study combined SS-31 with NMN after brain ischaemia, which is the only combination evidence in the ledger; it is quoted in the combination section if that section is present, and it is not a human result.

Editorial synthesis Written from general pharmacology, the development record and what is commonly reported; not a cited finding. Cited findings on this page carry their own tier.

Exclusion criteria in studies

Who each trial excluded, as stated in the abstract.

  • Randomized controlled trial humans n = 218 2023 Human clinical trial
    After screening, eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either 24 weeks of elamipretide at a dose of 40 mg/d or placebo subcutaneously.
    Source pmid-37268435 · quoted verbatim from the abstract

Other compounds in its class

Same class in the registry: Humanin, MOTS-c. Each row shows what that compound's own record states; nothing is inferred across rows.

3 compounds in the mitochondrial peptides class. Each row states what that compound's own record says; nothing is inferred across rows.
CompoundTierPublicationsRCTsRecord
SS-31 Approved label 493 16 draft
Humanin Human clinical trial 589 5 draft
MOTS-c Human clinical trial 277 4 draft

Regulatory status: an approved medicine since September 2025

Registry facts only. Jurisdiction-level status, compounding categories and sport prohibitions need their own cited documents before they appear here.

  • An approved prescription medicine in the United States since 19 September 2025: Forzinity (elamipretide hydrochloride), granted accelerated approval to improve muscle strength in adults and children with Barth syndrome who weigh at least 30 kg, supplied as 280 mg in 3.5 mL (80 mg/mL) for once-daily subcutaneous injection. Accelerated approval means the sponsor must confirm clinical benefit in a further study. It is not approved for primary mitochondrial myopathy, heart failure, dry macular degeneration or optic neuropathy, all of which were tried. Not approved in the EU. Vials sold as 'SS-31 peptide' are unapproved products containing the same molecule. The compound is not named on the WADA Prohibited List; the live list should be checked. The prescribing information is not yet in the ledger.Editorial synthesis
    Editorial synthesis from general knowledge · primary document to be added to the ledger

Open questions and limitations

What is genuinely unknown, stated plainly. A missing field is not evidence that the outcome is safe, effective, or established.

  • The Forzinity prescribing information, the PROGRESS-HF heart-failure trial and the ReCLAIM-2 macular-degeneration trial are cited from public summaries and are not yet in the ledger.
  • No trial has given elamipretide to healthy people for longer than a single infusion.
  • The confirmatory study required by the accelerated approval has not reported.

Questions people ask

What is the half-life of SS-31?

Short, measured in hours. The 2021 trial in older adults found the effect of a single two-hour infusion on muscle energetics had gone by day 7 and called that consistent with elamipretide's half-life in human blood; the trials and the label therefore use once-daily subcutaneous injection. No abstract in the ledger states the figure, so this page does not.

What is SS-31?

SS-31 is the research name of elamipretide, a four-amino-acid synthetic peptide that concentrates in the inner mitochondrial membrane and binds cardiolipin. It was developed as Bendavia and MTP-131 by Stealth BioTherapeutics and, since 19 September 2025, is an FDA-approved medicine, Forzinity, for muscle strength in Barth syndrome. Vials sold as 'SS-31 peptide' are the same molecule from unregulated suppliers.

Does SS-31 work as eye drops?

A 1% topical solution was tested for 52 weeks in 12 people with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. It was well tolerated but visual acuity did not differ from the vehicle-treated eyes; a post hoc visual-field measure favoured treatment. Company trials in dry macular degeneration (ReCLAIM-2) missed their primary endpoints, per public reports; those papers are not in the ledger.

Can SS-31 help with weight loss?

No trial has measured weight or fat as an outcome, and none was designed to. Elamipretide's trials measured walking distance, fatigue, muscle strength, heart volumes and mitochondrial ATP production. The metabolic reputation belongs to MOTS-c, a different peptide, and is untested for SS-31.

How was SS-31 given in the trials?

By subcutaneous injection once a day in every trial from MMPOWER-2 onward and on the approved label; by two-hour intravenous infusion in the first dose-finding trial and the older-adult trial; as 1% eye drops in the optic-neuropathy trial. Site selection and technique are on the Forzinity label, which this page does not reproduce.

Should SS-31 be taken with MOTS-c?

No study has tested the pair, in any order or in any species. The sequencing advice on forums is invented. Each compound's own record is the whole of what is known: SS-31 has randomized trials in mitochondrial disease; MOTS-c has small human studies and mouse work.

Is SS-31 the same as elamipretide and Forzinity?

Yes. SS-31 is the laboratory name from the Szeto-Schiller series, elamipretide is the generic drug name, MTP-131 and Bendavia were development names, and Forzinity is the FDA-approved brand since 19 September 2025. Vials sold as 'SS-31 peptide' contain the same molecule from unregulated suppliers.

What is SS-31 approved for?

To improve muscle strength in adults and children with Barth syndrome who weigh at least 30 kg, under accelerated approval, which requires a confirmatory study. It is not approved for mitochondrial myopathy, heart failure, eye disease, ageing or anything else it was tried for.

What did the SS-31 trials show?

In Barth syndrome, no effect in 12 weeks of randomized treatment but sustained gains in walking distance, strength and heart volumes over 168 weeks of open-label treatment, and a large advantage over untreated patients in a natural-history comparison. In 218 people with mitochondrial myopathy, no effect on walking distance or fatigue at 24 weeks. In healthy older adults, a single infusion raised muscle ATP capacity for hours and did not change fatigue.

Is there an SS-31 dose?

For the approved use, yes: the label gives a once-daily subcutaneous dose for patients of at least 30 kg from an 80 mg/mL solution, halved in severe kidney impairment. Every subcutaneous trial used 40 mg once daily. For energy or longevity there is no dose, because there is no trial; the figures on vendor pages were not taken from the programme.

What are the side effects of SS-31?

Injection-site reactions, in up to 80% of treated participants, mostly mild. Across the randomized trials nothing else separated from placebo, and the trials called the drug well tolerated. Months of use in healthy people have never been studied, so their safety is unmeasured.

Is SS-31 an antioxidant?

Not in the scavenging sense. It concentrates in the inner mitochondrial membrane and binds cardiolipin, which is thought to keep the respiratory-chain complexes properly arranged and stop cytochrome c acting as a peroxidase. Less reactive oxygen is a downstream result, and its developers now describe it as cardiolipin-protective rather than antioxidant.

Does SS-31 help with ageing or longevity?

No trial has tested it. The nearest evidence is the 2021 trial in 39 healthy adults aged 60 to 85: one two-hour infusion raised muscle mitochondrial ATP capacity immediately, the effect was gone by day 7, and fatigue resistance did not change. No lifespan or healthspan outcome has been measured in people.

Why did the big myopathy trial fail if the drug was approved?

Because the two conditions differ. Barth syndrome is a disorder of cardiolipin itself, the lipid the drug binds; primary mitochondrial myopathy is a genotypically mixed group in which cardiolipin is not the primary defect. A post hoc analysis of MMPOWER-3 suggested benefit in the subgroup with nuclear-DNA mutations, which is a hypothesis for a future trial, not a result.

Is SS-31 banned in sport?

It is not named on the WADA Prohibited List, and as an approved medicine it does not fall under the S0 catch-all for unapproved substances. The list changes yearly and should be checked; this page does not track it.

Can SS-31 be taken orally?

No oral form has been studied in people. Every trial used subcutaneous injection, intravenous infusion or eye drops, and the approved product is an injection. A four-amino-acid peptide taken by mouth would be expected to be digested.

Which species has SS-31 been studied in?

Humans, in eleven studies in the ledger; mice and rats, in models of stroke, cardiac arrest, pulmonary fibrosis, ageing and oocyte quality; pigs, in embryo culture; and human cells. The animal literature is far larger than the human one and runs ahead of it in indications.

Has SS-31 been combined with MOTS-c or NAD+?

Not with MOTS-c in any study. One 2026 mouse study combined SS-31 with the NAD+ precursor NMN after brain ischaemia and reported less damage than either alone; it is a mouse result and the only combination evidence in the ledger.

Sources

Full citations. Every claim above links to one of these by its id.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
Show the remaining 22 sources
  1. 13
  2. 14
  3. 15
  4. 16
  5. 17
  6. 18
  7. 19
  8. 20
  9. 21
  10. 22
  11. 23
  12. 24
  13. 25
  14. 26
  15. 27
  16. 28
  17. 29
  18. 30
  19. 31
  20. 32
    Mitochondrial oxidative stress in aging and healthspan.
    pmid-24860647 · · peer-reviewed
  21. 33
  22. 34
    Mitochondrial approaches for neuroprotection.
    pmid-19076459 · · peer-reviewed

Reference card

Reference card · generated /compounds/ss-31
Compound
SS-31, mitochondrial peptides
Evidence tier
Approved label
Indexed publications
493 · 16 RCTs · 14 other clinical trials
Approval
approved (2025)
Routes reported
intravenous, oral, subcutaneous, topical
Reviewed
Adam Mirando, PharmD,

Study figures are as published in each source and are not recommendations. Print or save this card with its date.

Last reviewed and what changed

Newest first. These are the record's own revision dates, and the same dates feed the sitemap.

  1. · Reviewed by Adam Mirando, PharmD, on 2026-09-29.
  2. · Written under the sequencing rule after research/intents/ss-31.json: guide (8 sections incl. a trial-by-trial table), FAQ to 12 plus 10 from the map, mechanism, reported-use, regulatory (Forzinity approval 2025-09-19, pending_source for the label) and timeline claims; evidence tier set to approved-label by hand; three misdrafted interactions claims removed; intent-driven H1 and title. Triage: ChEMBL approval fields set by hand so the fact tiles agree with the tier; two directory links added.
  3. · Claims drafted extractively from 32 ledger sources by scripts/draft_claims.py: 42 claims, 25 evidence-table rows. Status researched -> draft.
  4. · Claims drafted extractively from 32 ledger sources by scripts/draft_claims.py: 45 claims, 25 evidence-table rows. Status researched -> draft.
  5. · Evidence fetched from Europe PMC and ChEMBL by scripts/fetch_evidence.py; claims not yet written.